Drawing for VASOFLOW

USPTO serial 86893670

VASOFLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
OEHRLEIN, STEFAN M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - MANAGING ATTORNEY

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VASOFLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Chad W. Miller

CHAD W. MILLER WEIDE & MILLER, LTD.10655 Park Run Drive, Suite 100LAS VEGAS, NV 89144UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Artificial vascular grafts; Filters for medical purposes, namely, intervascular blood filters; Filter delivery system for the placement of blood filters; Fabric for medical dressings, linens, pillow cases, and clothing having low friction interface to reduce pressure and sheer stress on skin, sutures, and woundsACTIVEJan 1, 2019

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 10, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 28, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Aug 23, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Aug 23, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 1, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 28, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Feb 28, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 25, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Feb 25, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 25, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 9, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Aug 9, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Aug 9, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 27, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 23, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 23, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Feb 23, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 23, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 23, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 23, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 25, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 23, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 23, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 23, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 28, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 24, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 16, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 6, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Feb 5, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 4, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance