Drawing for TRUEODDS

USPTO serial 86896489

TRUEODDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SANDER, DREW M
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUEODDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anne E. Naffziger

ANNE E. NAFFZIGER LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTD.1981 N. BROADWAY, SUITE 310WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable mobile applications for use in providing electronic horse-racing information for use by handicappers and enthusiastsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Sep 17, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 6, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 2, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 2, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 2, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 21, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Sep 20, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 20, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Aug 24, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 7, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 7, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Aug 7, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Aug 7, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 20, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 20, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 4, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 29, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 28, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 28, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 9, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Feb 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 6, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance