USPTO serial 86909182
FACILITYFIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 15, 2016
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with FACILITYFIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Philadelphia, PA, US
Philadelphia, PA, US
Philadelphia, PA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Camille M. Miller
Camille M. Miller Cozen O'Connor1650 MARKET STREET, Suite 2800One Liberty PlacePHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computerized management maintenance system software for inventory control, scheduling maintenance, scheduling inspections of equipment, controlling building environments, granting building access and for operating security systems, for use with facility services, environmental services, and transportation services | ACTIVE | May 16, 2016 |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in database management, for service desk management, for use as a spreadsheet, for word processing, for use in accounting in the fields of facility services, environmental services, and transportation services; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in database management, for service desk management, for accounting, for use as a spreadsheet, for word processing in the fields of facility services, environmental services, and transportation services | ACTIVE | May 16, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aramark Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Aramark Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Aramark Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FACILITYFIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 14, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 13, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 29, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |