USPTO serial 86909760
HUMANFORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HUMANFORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Crittenden
DIANE M REDD KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN STREETFOURTEENTH FLOORIRVINE, 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software for use by employees in tracking time and attendance, project time recording, accessing timesheets and pay slips, updating personal employee information and scheduling; Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software for keeping track of employee hours, rosters, schedules, awards, salaries, assignments, productivity, and personal information for use in workforce management and payroll administration; Software as a Service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in electronic time control, namely, for use in recording and reporting time clock data; Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software for management of personnel, human resources, and payroll administration in the nature of software for keeping track of employee hours, rosters, schedules, awards, salaries, assignments, productivity, and personal information; Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in event management and scheduling for employees; Computer services, namely, an application service provider featuring software for keeping track of employee hours, rosters, schedules, awards, salaries, assignments, productivity, and personal information in the field of personnel, human resources and payroll administration; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer software problems; Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; Design, development and implementation of software in the field of personnel, human resources and payroll administration | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |