USPTO serial 86911890
BUBBLE TIME STATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NOVAKOVIC, MIROSLAV
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUBBLE TIME STATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ladysmith, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deanna Shannon
DEANNA SHANNON NEXUS LAW GROUP LLP625 HOWE ST STE 1140VANCOUVER, BC, V6C2T6CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing a continuing program in the field of children's entertainment accessible by satellite, audio, video and computer networks; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable videos in the field of children's entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2018 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |