USPTO serial 86914129
OTTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 9, 2019
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with OTTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MILWAUKEE, WI
Kitchener, Ontario, CA
Kitchener, Ontario, CA
Kitchener, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Autonomous mobile industrial robots with robotic arms for material handling in warehousing or manufacturing facilities in the academic, military, mining, agricultural, retail, residential, first responder, warehousing, logistics, and manufacturing fields | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2016 |
| 012 | Autonomous mobile robotic transport vehicles used to carry a variety of payloads from one place to another within a warehouse or manufacturing facility in the academic, military, mining, agricultural, retail, residential, first responder, warehousing, logistics, and manufacturing fields | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2016 |
| 042 | Providing in-house and on-site computer systems integration of the autonomy platform and fleets of robotic transport vehicles and industrial robots and components thereof on behalf of third parties in the academic, military, mining, agricultural, retail, residential, first responder, warehousing, logistics, and manufacturing fields; providing and integrating third party hardware and computer software systems to meet client requirements for deployment of autonomous mobile robots and fleets thereof; providing IT consulting and support services in the nature of IT integration services relating to deployment of autonomous mobile robots and fleets thereof and related technologies in the academic, military, mining, agricultural, retail, residential, first responder, warehousing, logistics, and manufacturing fields | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Clearpath Robotics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Clearpath Robotics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Clearpath Robotics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OTTO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 1, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 7, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 31, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 15, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2018 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 20, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |