USPTO serial 86914343
ROCK PAPER SCISSORS RPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RYDLAND, STEPHANIE DIANA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROCK PAPER SCISSORS RPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert T. Patty
HERBERT T. PATTY THE LAW OFFICE OF HERBERT T. PATTY, P.C.1625 THE ALAMEDA, SUITE 508SAN JOSE, CA 95126UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing educational mentoring services and programs in the field of empowerment, self-esteem, health, and social skills; providing motivational speaking services in the field of preventing sexual abuse, human trafficking, domestic violence, and emotional abuse | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rock Paper Scissors Foundation
- Other trademarks owned by Rock Paper Scissors Foundation
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ROCK PAPER SCISSORS RPS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2018 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 11, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |