USPTO serial 86918665
BENE-FIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5434958Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 27, 2018
- Examiner
- SANDER, DREW M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BENE-FIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. Mark Murrah
C. MARK MURRAH MURRAH & KILLOUGH, PLLC3000 WESLAYAN STE 305HOUSTON, TX 77027UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Brokerage in the field of employee insurance benefit plans; evaluating, designing, implementing, processing, administering and managing employee benefit plans, namely, insurance plans, and providing wellness information in the field of employee benefits, namely, insurance plans | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2024 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 16, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |