Drawing for VARI

USPTO serial 86927170

VARI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HERRERA-MARCUS, ROSELLE MORALDE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VARI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebecca Liebowitz

REBECCA LIEBOWITZ VENABLE LLPP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Adjustable height desktop; chairs; office chairs; ergonomic chairs; desks; adjustable height desks; furniture parts, namely, adjustable ergonomic platforms for desks; furniture parts, namely, adjustable height platforms for desksACTIVE
035Retail store services and on-line retail store services featuring office furniture and office productsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Nov 22, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Nov 20, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Nov 13, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Nov 13, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 31, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 31, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 31, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 14, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jul 14, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Apr 22, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 20, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 20, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 20, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 1, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 6, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 6, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 2, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 29, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 29, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 29, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 28, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 21, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 7, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance