USPTO serial 86938487
OLLIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NUNLEY, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OLLIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Clarida
ROBERT W CLARIDA REITLER KAILAS & ROSENBLATT LLC885 THIRD AVENUE 20TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Pet foods | ACTIVE | Oct 5, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 10, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |