CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for DA FOUNDATION

USPTO serial 86943107

DA FOUNDATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ONUOHA, UKACHUKWU FREDERICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DA FOUNDATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel M. Cislo

DANIEL M. CISLO CISLO & THOMAS LLP12100 WILSHIRE BLVD., SUITE 1700LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-7103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, gels, hair sprayACTIVE—
005Medicinal hair growth applications preparations, namely, aerosols, lotions, and sprays; all of the foregoing containing MinoxidilACTIVE—
008Electric hand-held hair styling ironsACTIVE—
011Electric hair blow dryersACTIVE—
021Hair brushes, hair combsACTIVE—
026Wigs and hair pieces for women, hair pieces, hair extensionsACTIVE—
044Hair restoration services; hair replacement solutions for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 9, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 6, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 6, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 11, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 1, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 22, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 4, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 28, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 7, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance