USPTO serial 86950428
SETO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOO, JEANE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SETO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Taipei City, TW
New Taipei City, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Slattery
JAMES M SLATTERY BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing apparatus; computers; computer terminals; notebook computers; handheld computers; portable computers; personal computers; desktop computers; tablet computers which have CPU calculation function, memory storage function, long term storage function, and screening and touching function; mobile workstation, namely, notebook computer with high-end computing features not typical of the notebook, faster graphics processors, more powerful CPUs, additional memory, enabling portable 3D design, scientific computing and multimedia creation; none of the aforementioned goods to be used in relation to medical devices and/or patient monitoring | ACTIVE | Jun 5, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2018 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 26, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 11, 2017 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2017 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 3, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |