USPTO serial 86965147
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Woodstock, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brie A. Crawford
BRIE A CRAWFORD CRAWFORD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW LLC1095 PINGREE ROADSUITE 204CRYSTAL LAKE, IL 60014| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Athletic flooring; Floor panels not of metal; Floor tiles, not of metal; Flooring comprised of rubber adapted for physical fitness activities; Flooring underlayments; Rubber flooring; Rubber and synthetic non-metal tiles for use on indoor and outdoor floors; Sports surfaces, namely, running tracks and playing fields made of polyurethane; Non-metal floor panels; Non-metal floor tiles; Rubber floor tiles; Synthetic, non-metal surfaces for playgrounds, sports terrains and play areas | ACTIVE | Mar 27, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 29, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 29, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |