USPTO serial 86975003
SELPHI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SELPHI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New Orleans, LA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Lee
JENNIFER LEE SEALE & ROSSPO BOX 699HAMMOND, LA 70404-0699UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store and online retail store services featuring clothing, clothing accessories, footwear, jewelry, handbags, and fashion accessories | ACTIVE | Nov 19, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |