USPTO serial 86981029
STRIDERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 7, 2017
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STRIDERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SPORTECH VENUES CALIFORNIA, LLC
NEW HAVEN, CT
SPORTECH VENUES CALIFORNIA, LLC
NEW HAVEN, CT
SPORTECH VENUES CALIFORNIA, LLC
NEW HAVEN, CT
NEW HAVEN, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN F. ROTH
STEPHEN F. ROTH LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, KRUMHOLZ & MENTLIK, LLP600 SOUTH AVENUE WESTWESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1497UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, pants, shirts, hats, sweatshirts, jackets, and coats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 30, 2015 |
| 032 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, beer | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Gambling and betting services; providing off-track betting facilities; entertainment services, namely, providing simulcast horse races and televised sporting events; gambling services; betting pools services; betting services; providing information services about the playing of gambling, betting | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 30, 2015 |
| 043 | RESTAURANT, BAR, AND CATERING SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 30, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SPORTECH VENUES CALIFORNIA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SPORTECH VENUES CALIFORNIA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SPORTECH VENUES CALIFORNIA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SPORTECH VENUES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named STRIDERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 3, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 26, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 30, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |