USPTO serial 86981816
BRIGHTCLOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2017
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BRIGHTCLOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,295*
Plus Government fees of $3,250
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Broomfield, CO, US
Broomfield, CO, US
Broomfield, CO, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for providing privacy protection | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2008 |
| 035 | management of computer networks for business purposes, namely, optimising use of computer hardware, computer software, information technology applications, and computer networks; outsourcing; on-line data processing services; database management; advisory, information and consultancy services relating to all the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2008 |
| 038 | Providing access to computer networks over telecommunications networks; providing access between computers and computer networks over telecommunications networks; providing access between computer networks and servers over telecommunications networks; providing access between computers and servers over telecommunications networks; electronic transmission of data over telecommunications networks; advisory and consultancy services relating to communications between computers over telecommunications networks; advisory services relating to providing remote access of computer hardware over telecommunications networks; advisory services relating to providing remote access of computer software over telecommunication networks; advisory, information and consultancy services relating to all the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2008 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing privacy protection by identifying and blocking threats to privacy by restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2008 |
| 045 | Computer services, namely, monitoring of computer systems and computer networks for security purposes that involves analyzing and classifying IT information including data, applications, and networks all being part of the process of monitoring of computer systems for security purposes; Computer services, namely, facilitating provision of secure web browsers by monitoring and analyzing threats for security purposes | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Webroot Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Webroot Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Webroot Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named BRIGHTCLOUD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 8, 2017 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 2016 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |