Drawing for CURIOSITYSTREAM

USPTO serial 86982510

CURIOSITYSTREAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5381346Status 702Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 16, 2018
Examiner
REINHART, MEGHAN M
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with CURIOSITYSTREAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony D. Peluso

Anthony D. Peluso ArentFox Schiff LLP555 West Fifth Street, 48th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90013United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Subscription video on demand transmission services; video-on-demand transmission services via the InternetACTIVEMar 18, 2015
041Educational services, namely, developing and conducting interviews, lectures, workshops, presentations, and retreats in the fields of science, technology, civilization, and the human spirit; Providing a website featuring educational materials, namely, online publications in the nature of newsletters, weblogs, educational texts, in the fields of science, technology, civilization, and the human spirit; Providing non-downloadable videos, namely, documentaries and instructional presentations in the fields of science, technology, civilization, and the human spirit provided via a video-on-demand serviceACTIVEMar 18, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2024NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2024C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 23, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 9, 2024E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2023REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 7, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 16, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 12, 2017SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2017CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Dec 8, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 6, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 31, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 11, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 11, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 11, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 11, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 15, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 20, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 1, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 30, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 21, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 6, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 2, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 18, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance