USPTO serial 86984249
FIBER MOUNTAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 11, 2018
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with FIBER MOUNTAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cheshire, CT
Cheshire, CT
Cheshire, CT
NORMAN, OK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wendy E. Miller
Wendy E. Miller Wissing Miller LLP31 Hudson Yards, 11th FloorIndustrious at Hudson YardsNew York, NY 10001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software defined networking system, namely, optical communication and physical layer infrastructure equipment, products, and systems used in communication networks, namely, containerized equipment of racks, rows, and pods and their interconnects; packet based routing and forwarding devices, namely, computer network switches; interconnecting hardware for packet based routing and forwarding devices, namely, panels for patching, bulk cabling and harnesses, active cross connect devices; SDN (software defined networking) electrical and virtual machine based controllers; SDN electrical and virtual machine based controllers having NFV (network function virtualization) functionality, switches, fiber optic switches, fiber optic switches with embedded intelligent connector and cable identifying technology, high density fiber optic switches, high density fiber optic switches with embedded intelligent connector and cable identifying technology, cross-connects being fiber optic cables, fiber optic cross-connects being fiber optic cables, fiber optic cross-connects being fiber optic cables with embedded intelligent connector and cable identifying technology, patch panels, namely, panels supporting networking ports, for housing interconnects of cables, fiber optic patch panels for housing interconnects of fiber optic cables, fiber optic patch panels for housing interconnects of fiber optic cables with embedded intelligent connector and cable identifying technology, routers, fiber optic routers, fiber optic routers with embedded intelligent connector and cable identifying technology, electrical interconnect cables, fiber mesh interconnect cables, network interface cards, network interface cards with embedded intelligent connector and cable identifying technology, computer servers, computer servers with embedded intelligent connector and cable identifying technology, computer software for monitoring, analyzing, operating, managing and maintaining communication networks, computer software for controlling route flows of data packets in communication networks, fiber optic cables and fiber optic cables with embedded intelligent cable identifying technology, fabrics of intelligent fiber optics and active optical switches, and computer software for remotely configuring and monitoring fabrics of intelligent fiber optics and active optical switches | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fiber Mountain, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Fiber Mountain, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Fiber Mountain, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GREEN LAMBDA CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named FIBER MOUNTAIN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | PCBM | PETITION TO DIRECTOR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 18, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 17, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 2, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2015 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2015 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |