CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CONAVI

USPTO serial 86984270

CONAVI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5700100Status 702Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 19, 2019
Examiner
CROWLEY, PAUL
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with CONAVI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven M. Forte

Steven M. Forte Honigman LLP39400 Woodward Ave, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for controlling medical imaging equipment; computer software for 2D and 3D medical image reconstruction and display; medical workstations and peripherals consisting of computer hardware and software for image analysis, archiving and transmitting of patient image dataACTIVENov 21, 2016
010Medical apparatus and imaging catheters for use in therapeutic and surgical procedures; medical and surgical catheters; ultrasound catheters; optical catheters; medical ultrasound imaging probes; medical optical imaging probes; medical imaging devices, namely, 2D and 3D medical imaging devices and ultrasound and optical coherence tomography imaging devicesACTIVENov 21, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2025NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2025C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 21, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 19, 2025E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2024REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 1, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 1, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2018AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2018IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Nov 20, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2018AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 14, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 14, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 8, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 5, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2018EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 1, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 18, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 11, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 10, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 31, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 20, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance