Drawing for PANERA FOOD AS IT SHOULD BE

USPTO serial 86984538

PANERA FOOD AS IT SHOULD BE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6037372Status 702Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 21, 2020
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with PANERA FOOD AS IT SHOULD BE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

N. Christopher Norton

N. Christopher Norton ArentFox Schiff LLP1717 K St., NWWashington, DC 20006United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Services for providing food and drink; temporary accommodation; Restaurant, cafe and catering services; take-out restaurant services; restaurants featuring delivery; food preparation; preparation of carry out foods and beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 17, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 7, 2026NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2026C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 7, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 6, 2026E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2025REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 24, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 27, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 20, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 21, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 20, 2020SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2020CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Mar 3, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 29, 2020SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 29, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 29, 2020EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 28, 2020IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 28, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2020EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 28, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2020EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 10, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 8, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 8, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 6, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 10, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 8, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 6, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 8, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 27, 2017TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jun 27, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 27, 2017OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 4, 2016OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 24, 2015ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 7, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 23, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 28, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance