CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for REJUVENATE

USPTO serial 87073748

REJUVENATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PATEL, SAMIR RAMESH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REJUVENATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terry L. Clark

TERRY L CLARK BASS BERRY & SIMS PLC1201 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW SUITE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002PaintsACTIVEJun 6, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 11, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 11, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 22, 2019EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 1, 2019RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Mar 7, 2019GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2019GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2019CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 22, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 15, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 5, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 5, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 7, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 7, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 7, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 11, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2016TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Jun 20, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance