Drawing for JOINT PLAY

USPTO serial 87078482

JOINT PLAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JOINT PLAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Christopher Braidwood

G. CHRISTOPHER BRAIDWOOD LEMPIA SUMMERFIELD KATZ LLC20 S. CLARK STREETSUITE 600CHICAGO, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical apparatus, namely, a robotic test apparatus for testing joints, for medical diagnostic and treatment purposesACTIVE
044Medical services, namely, orthopedic joint examinationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 26, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Dec 26, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 17, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Dec 17, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 15, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
May 8, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
May 1, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 29, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Apr 29, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Apr 29, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 4, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 30, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Nov 30, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Nov 30, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 9, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 7, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 7, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 7, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 14, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 12, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 12, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 12, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 20, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 25, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 25, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 11, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 9, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 27, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 24, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance