Drawing for 141

USPTO serial 87083833

141

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 141?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph G. Chu

Joseph G. Chu JCIP155 N Lake Avenue, Suite 800Century SquarePasadena, CA 91101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Plastic banners; vinyl banners; plastic flagsACTIVE
026Cloth patches for clothing; embroidered patches for clothing; ornamental adhesive patches for jackets; ornamental cloth patches; patches for clothing made of rubber, plastic and vinyl; ornamental novelty pins; ornamental novelty badgesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 22, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 5, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 5, 2020NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Feb 4, 2020EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Feb 4, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jan 3, 2020EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jan 3, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jan 3, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Jan 3, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 6, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 4, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jul 4, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 4, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 8, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 8, 2019NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Feb 7, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 7, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 7, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jan 4, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 4, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jan 4, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Jan 4, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 5, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 3, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 3, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 3, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 26, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 22, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 22, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 22, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 4, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 9, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 9, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 19, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 31, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 27, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 15, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 3, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 1, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Jun 30, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 29, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance