USPTO serial 87102506
GONE IN 60 SECONDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- INGRAM, KYLE G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GONE IN 60 SECONDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul D. Supnik
Paul D. Supnik LAW OFFICE OF PAUL D. SUPNIK9401 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 1250BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded material, namely, CDs and DVDs featuring motoring and motor vehicles; downloadable audio and video files featuring motoring and motor vehicles; mobile software applications for mobile phones, portable media players, handheld computers, tablet computers and personal computers, namely, software for accessing digital content, namely, audio, video and text; Magnetic data carriers and recording discs featuring motoring and motor vehicles; prerecorded compact discs, DVDs and flash drives, featuring motoring and motor vehicles; computer software for accessing audio, video and text online | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing television program series featuring motoring and motor vehicles; non-downloadable audio and video recordings featuring motoring and motor vehicles; non-downloadable television programs featuring motoring and motor vehicles provided via a video-on-demand service, on the internet, broadcasting through cable and through network broadcast | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Halicki, Denice Shakarian
- Other trademarks owned by Halicki, Denice Shakarian
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named GONE IN 60 SECONDS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 7, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 25, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |