USPTO serial 87106586
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Castle Rock, CO
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott D. Kumpf
SCOTT D KUMPF KUMPF CHARSLEY & HANSEN LLC9565 S KINGSTON COURT SUITE 100ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Cutting boards; Cutting boards for the kitchen; Kitchen containers; Wood chopping boards for kitchen use; Chopping boards for kitchen use; Cutting boards for the kitchen; Wood chopping boards for kitchen use | ACTIVE | Jun 15, 2016 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 18, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |