Drawing for SEA TREASURE

USPTO serial 87138085

SEA TREASURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SNABB, SANDRA MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEA TREASURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian E. Turung

BRIAN E. TURUNG FAY SHARPE LLP1228 EUCLID AVENUECLEVELAND, OH 44115UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Seafood products, namely, frozen appetizers consisting primarily of seafood; fresh-frozen seafood, namely, shrimp, clam strips, crab cakes, scallops, calamari, popcorn fish, popcorn shrimp, fish fillets; fresh and frozen seafood, namely, shrimp, clam strips, crab cakes, scallops, calamari, popcorn fish, popcorn shrimp, fish fillets; specialty seafood frozen appetizers; crab cakes; salmon cakes; salmon burger patties; seafood dip; fish bites, namely, fish-based snack foods; seafood bites, namely, fish, clams, crab, scampi and shrimp based snack foods; seafood fries; shrimp fries; breaded seafood; breaded shrimp; breaded clams; seafood rolls consisting of seafood; seafood burger patties; shrimp burger patties; fish burger pattiesACTIVE
030Salmon burger sandwiches; breaded fish and shrimp spring rolls, seafood spring rolls; shrimp pot stickers; seafood pot stickers; seafood roll sandwiches; seafood burger sandwiches; shrimp burger sandwiches; fish burger sandwichesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 2, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 4, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 4, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 24, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 23, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 23, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 23, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 19, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance