USPTO serial 87151416
HOLLAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOLLAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew B. Chen
ANDREW B. CHEN LKP GLOBAL LAW, LLPSTE 4801901 AVENUE OF THE STARSLOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cutlery, namely, forks, knives, spoons; disposable and plastic cutlery, namely, forks, knives, and spoons | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | USB-powered fans, namely, desktop fans for home and office use; flashlights; lamps; lamps, namely, table lamps and desk lamps; USB-powered lights, namely, desk lights, night lights for children, flash lights for outdoors | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Desktop organizers; stationery, namely, notebooks, notepads, paper; stationery accessories, namely, pens, pencils, highlighter markers, erasers, pen and pencil cases, paper and binder clips, push pins, sticky note papers, binders, folders, paper staplers, adhesive tape dispensers for household or stationery use; photo storage boxes; desk baskets for desk accessories | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Back packs | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Shower curtain rings; shower rods; shower curtain hooks; non-metallic bottle stoppers, namely, silicone bottle stoppers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hollar Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hollar Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named HOLLAR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 25, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 25, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |