USPTO serial 87158559
3BEACHES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BODRI, KRISTIN MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 3BEACHES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Miami QLD 4220, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANNE HIARING HOCKING
ANNE HIARING HOCKING Niamh Marie Brennan2574 Gold Coast HigwayMermaid Beach, 4218AUSTRALIAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Furnishing fabrics, namely, waterproof and flame resistant furnishing fabrics; unfitted furniture coverings of plastic or textile, namely, loose furniture covers; cushion covers; textiles, cloth and fabric, namely, waterproof and treated textiles, cloth and fabric for the manufacture of cushions, furniture, umbrellas, blankets, textile tablecloths, napkins, place mats and table runners; coated textiles, namely, fabrics coated with thermoplastic coatings for use in manufacturing in a wide variety of industries; covers for cushions and unfitted fabric covers for furniture; textile curtains; textiles for use in the manufacture of blinds, curtains and drapes; textiles for kitchen use, namely, tea towels; bath linen, namely, towels and hand towels, excluding beach towels and bath towels; wall coverings made of textile materials; wall hangings of textile; bed and bedroom linen, namely, sheets, pillow cases, quilts and fabric valances; blankets, namely, bed and lap blankets made of cotton, wool or man-made fibres; mattress covers, other than incontinence covers; napery, namely, textile tablecloths, table napkins of textile and textile place mats; table cloths not of paper; table runners not of paper | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |