USPTO serial 87167425
TECHOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 1, 2019
- Examiner
- HUDSON,TAMARA BREE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 704 applies to Madrid Protocol extensions of protection in the U.S. Section 71 (similar to Section 8) showing continued use was accepted. The U.S. extension remains active. Follow Madrid and USPTO deadlines for the next renewal cycle.
Need help with TECHOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ANHUI TECHNOLOGY IMP. & EXP. CO., LTD.
Anhui, CN
Other trademarks owned by ANHUI TECHNOLOGY IMP. & EXP. CO., LTD.
ANHUI TECHNOLOGY IMP. & EXP. CO., LTD.
Anhui, CN
Other trademarks owned by ANHUI TECHNOLOGY IMP. & EXP. CO., LTD.
ANHUI TECHNOLOGY IMP. & EXP. CO., LTD.
Anhui, CN
Other trademarks owned by ANHUI TECHNOLOGY IMP. & EXP. CO., LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Esther Kim
PO Box 660122MD2508TR-002Arcadia, CA 91066Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | [ Diving lights ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 25, 2019 |
| 024 | Bed blankets; Bed covers; Bed linen; Bedsheets; [ Cashmere blankets; Draperies; Mosquito nets; ] Pillowcases; Quilts; [ Sleeping bags in the nature of sheeting; ] Travelling rugs; Woollen blankets | ACTIVE | Jun 25, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ANHUI TECHNOLOGY IMP. & EXP. CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ANHUI TECHNOLOGY IMP. & EXP. CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ANHUI TECHNOLOGY IMP. & EXP. CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named TECHOME
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2025 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 29, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 9, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2017 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |