CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for YNG+

USPTO serial 87169763

YNG+

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLOWERS, JAY K
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YNG+?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Patton

JOHN PATTON PATTON LAW GROUP, PLLC950 E. STATE HWY 114, SUITE 160SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for business and personal networking and sharing of informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 17, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 6, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 29, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 18, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 18, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 18, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 23, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance