USPTO serial 87170914
PARADIGM TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 20, 2018
- Examiner
- SHAH, RUPALI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with PARADIGM TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth Motolenich-Salas
Kenneth Motolenich-Salas MotoSalas Law, PLLC16210 North 63rd StreetScottsdale, AZ 85254UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Information technology and computer software consulting services for businesses across multiple industries, namely, providing recommendations and advice to businesses with respect to information technology infrastructure, data center design and management, computer application deployment and consolidation, consulting in the field of big data technology and data analytics, corporate compliance with respect to information technology in the nature of updating of information technology systems and computer software, information technology risk management in the nature of maintenance of information technology systems and computer software relating to information technology and computer security and information technology and computer risk prevention, migration to cloud-based data storage and management systems, design of cloud-based data storage systems and computer networks, cloud-based application development and migration, master data management for data governance and data analytics and reporting, information technology quality assurance and testing, mobile device management, data extraction-transformation-loading, data quality and integration, information technology dashboard and reporting function development, and computer network security monitoring, none of the foregoing in the fields of cognitive neuroscience and psychology research, the fenestration industry, electric light dimming systems, satellite carrier signals for navigation and control of equipment, health insurance plan brokerage, or the exploration and production of oil and gas | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Paradigm Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Paradigm Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Paradigm Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PARADIGM TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 5, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |