Drawing for DYNASCREEN

USPTO serial 87189506

DYNASCREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HISER, CHARLES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DYNASCREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew W. Bower

MATTHEW W. BOWER VARNUM, RIDDERING, SCHMIDT & HOWLETT LLP160 W. FORT STREET, 5TH FLOORDETROIT, MI 48226UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Education services, namely, conducting classes, workshops, and seminars in the field of injury screening, injury prevention, injury risk reduction, and physical activity; providing a website featuring information, advice and consulting on physical activity namely, physical fitness instructionACTIVE
044Providing health information, advice and consulting on physical injury risk reduction services, medical injury screening services and medical injury prevention servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 26, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 26, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 23, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 23, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 23, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 17, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 24, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 17, 2017GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jul 17, 2017GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jul 17, 2017EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY
Jul 17, 2017CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Jul 12, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 12, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 6, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Oct 5, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 4, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance