USPTO serial 87190937
SPIDEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPIDEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey K. Joyner
Jeffrey K. Joyner GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP1840 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 1900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical additives and agents for use in the manufacture of polycarbonates, polyurethanes, thermoplastic polyurethanes, elastomers, coatings, medical compounds, medicines, foams, cosmetics, adhesives, glues, 3D printing material, pellets for injection molding, thermosets chemicals, paints, films; plastic molding compounds for use in the manufacture of 3D printed parts, injection molded parts, medical devices, medical equipment, construction equipment, transportation components, chassis, transportation body panels, interior transportation components, sports equipment, ropes, Body panels for land vehicles, chassis for motor vehicles, chassis for electric cars, vehicles, aircraft fuselages, frames and aircraft wings, automated guided vehicles, automated assembly and positioning carts, towing vehicles for use in the aerospace industry, parachutes, Drones, boats, recreational watercraft, Aerodynamic wings for airplanes, Aeroplanes, Airplane propellers, Airplanes and structural parts therefor, Structural parts for airplanes, Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), trains and structural parts therefor, Adhesive rubber patches for repairing tubes or tires, racing cars, automobile structural parts for racing purposes, Frames for motorcycles, Motorcycle and automobile structural parts, motorcycle frames, bicycle frames, bicycles and bicycle parts, Motorcycle, Bicycle and automobile tires, light weight materials for vehicle chassis, interior pieces, airplane and drone fuselages, boat vessels or body, vehicle roof systems, wheels, body parts, tires, windows, fuel tank containers for motor and electric vehicles, airplanes, drones, motorcycles, boats, fuel tanks, fittings, seals, hoses, filters and pumps; Plastics, unprocessed; Synthetic resins, unprocessed; Unprocessed artificial resin; Adhesives and glues for industrial, medical and consumer uses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |