Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 87194410?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/87194410. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns ACTIVESENSORS?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 87194410, the listed owner(s) include: Area 1 Security, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 87194410?

Serial number 87194410 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark ACTIVESENSORS. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of ACTIVESENSORS?

ACTIVESENSORS (87194410) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover ACTIVESENSORS?

The public record lists International Classes: 009. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 87194410

ACTIVESENSORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Oct 5, 2016
Status date: Jan 29, 2019
Registration date: —
Examiner: WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACTIVESENSORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Area 1 Security, Inc.
Redwood City, CA
Other trademarks owned by Area 1 Security, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Perry J. Viscounty

JULIE DALKE LATHAM & WATKINS LLP650 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 2000COSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	Computer hardware, namely, sensors for searching the internet to identify and respond to computer security vulnerabilities; computer software for sensing computer security threats; intrusion detection software; data collection software; computer software for the collection of data and information	ACTIVE	Jan 9, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jan 29, 2019	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jan 29, 2019	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jan 29, 2019	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Nov 27, 2018	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Aug 31, 2018	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Aug 31, 2018	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Aug 31, 2018	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Aug 16, 2018	DPCC	DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Aug 16, 2018	AITU	CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL	—
Aug 14, 2018	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Aug 13, 2018	DRRR	DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED	—
Aug 13, 2018	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 13, 2018	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Aug 13, 2018	ERTD	TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED	—
Aug 13, 2018	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Aug 13, 2018	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Aug 13, 2018	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Feb 14, 2018	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Feb 14, 2018	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 14, 2018	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2018	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 24, 2018	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 24, 2018	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2018	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2017	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2017	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2017	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2017	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 15, 2017	AUPC	AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Jul 14, 2017	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 14, 2017	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2017	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
Jul 14, 2017	EAAU	TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED	—
Jan 16, 2017	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2017	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2017	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2017	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Oct 12, 2016	MPMK	NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED	—
Oct 11, 2016	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Oct 8, 2016	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—