Drawing for WE'D THE PEOPLE

USPTO serial 87200925

WE'D THE PEOPLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE'D THE PEOPLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William Fitzaptrick

WILLIAM FITZAPTRICK Eandi Fitzpatrick LLP633 W Fifth Stree 26th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90071UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing a website featuring entertainment information in the field(s) of general health and wellness, beauty products, cannabinoid benefits, culture, art, music, literature, film, food, current events, and politics; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable articles in the field of general health and wellness, beauty products, cannabinoid benefits, culture, art, music, literature, film, food, current events, and politics; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable publications in the nature of guides in the field of general health and wellness, beauty products, cannabinoid benefits, culture, art, music, literature, film, food, current events, and politics; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable videos in the field of general health and wellness, beauty products, cannabinoid benefits, culture, art, music, literature, film, food, current events, and politics; Providing a website featuring resources, namely, non-downloadable publications in the nature of pamphlets in the field of general health and wellness, beauty products, cannabinoid benefits, culture, art, music, literature, film, food, current events, and politicsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 4, 2018ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Oct 26, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Sep 26, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 26, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 17, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 14, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Aug 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 14, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 8, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 11, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 24, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 20, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 17, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 15, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance