Drawing for EXC ENCOUNTERS

USPTO serial 87201301

EXC ENCOUNTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PAQUIN, SAMUEL ROBERT
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXC ENCOUNTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerald E. Nagae, Reg. No. 29,418

MELISSA A NOWAK CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1201 THIRD AVE STE 3600SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services for cruise ship passengers in the fields of foreign cultures and entertainment, namely, organizing, planning, and conducting events conducted on board by local experts and entertainers in a destination's local culture and history; Educational information for cruise ship passengers in the fields of on board education about foreign cultures and cross-cultural education and featuring on board interactions and activities with native inhabitants at various ports of call and cruise ship destinationsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 7, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 7, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 27, 2018EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jan 10, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jan 10, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jan 10, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jan 10, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 10, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 8, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 20, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Dec 20, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 20, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 20, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 28, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jun 28, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 7, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 7, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 8, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Feb 2, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 2, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 18, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 15, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance