USPTO serial 87202022
NO CONCENTRATES HONESTY PLEDGE NON-GMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5195695Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 2, 2017
- Examiner
- FALK, ERIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NO CONCENTRATES HONESTY PLEDGE NON-GMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Upper Saddle River, NJ
Upper Saddle River, NJ
Upper Saddle River, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven W. Zoffer
Steven W. Zoffer Dickie McCamey & Chilcote, PC2 PPG PlaceSuite 400Pittsburgh, PA 15222Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Baby food; Baby food in the nature of food purees, namely, fruit purees, fruit and vegetable purees, fruit and grain purees, vegetable and grain purees, vegetable and legume purees, and cereals and biscuits for use as baby food; organic baby food; first, second and third stage baby foods; grain and fruit based snacks for use as baby food, all of the foregoing being non-GMO | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 2016 |
| 029 | Fruit and vegetable purees; fruit and grain purees; fruit and vegetable based snack foods; fruit and grain based snack foods; squeezable vegetable based snack foods; squeezable vegetable and fruit based snacks foods, all of the foregoing being non-GMO | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 2016 |
| 030 | Organic grain, fruit and vegetable based snack foods; squeezable grain and fruit based snack foods; grain, legume and vegetable based snack foods; grain, legume and fruit based snack foods, all of the foregoing being non-GMO | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sprout Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sprout Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sprout Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named NO CONCENTRATES HONESTY PLEDGE NON-GMO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 2, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |