Drawing for KNOWING TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 87202278

KNOWING TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KNOWING TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Don W. Bulson

DON W. BULSON RENNER OTTO BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP1621 EUCLID AVENUE - FLOOR 19CLEVELAND, OH 44115UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software and hardware for providing geospatial information; software and hardware for providing geospatial environmental information; software and hardware for geospatial intelligence; software and hardware for geospatial modelling; software and hardware for geospatial simulation; software and hardware for viewing geospatial information; software and hardware for processing geospatial information; software and hardware for cataloguing geospatial information; geospatial databases; software and hardware for tracking of items and peopleACTIVE
039GPS navigational services, namely, tracking of items and people; navigation services with global positioning system (GPS) for use in tracking people; provision of geospatial information using GIS (Geographical Information System) for use by third parties for purposes of allowing social network users to utilize the various services; providing geographic information in the nature of geospatial maps via a website and website linksACTIVE
042Geospatial information services, namely, computer services in the field of geospatial information systems, namely, geospatial data production services, namely, computer services in the nature of providing computer software platforms for visualization, analysis, exploitation, annotation and report generation of geospatial data; non-downloadable software for the management of images and facilities geospatial data; geospatial database services; geospatial environmental information services; geospatial intelligence services, namely, technical consulting services in the fields of geospatial prospecting, surveying, research, and engineering information and geospatial information systems and geomatics engineering in the nature of geospatial technology; geospatial modelling services; geospatial simulation services, namely consultation services and software development to create simulations and models, simulate business processes and visualize objects to enhance situational understanding; geospatial viewing services; geospatial processing services; geospatial cataloguing services; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for streaming 3D geospatial datasetsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 5, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 5, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 10, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 10, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 20, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 30, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 31, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 31, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 18, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 17, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance