USPTO serial 87205399
POD POCKETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POD POCKETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brampton, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. O"Malley
John J. O"Malley VOLPE AND KOENIG, P.C.30 South 17th StreetSuite 1800Philadelphia, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Carrying cases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2019 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |