USPTO serial 87205484
WORLD'S GREATEST VIDEOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5741851Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 30, 2019
- Examiner
- ADORNO SANTOS, LUZ M.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WORLD'S GREATEST VIDEOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Antonio, TX
San Antonio, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Quirk
WILLIAM H QUIRK ROSENTHAL PAUERSTEIN SANDOLOSKI AGATHER755 E MULBERRY SUITE 200SAN ANTONIO, TX 78212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Audio and video broadcasting services over the Internet or other communications network featuring the uploaded, posted, shown, displayed, and tagged videos of others; electronically transmitting information, audio, and video clips | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2019 |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, conducting contests and sweepstakes by broadcasting audio and video clips over the Internet or other communications network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2019 |
| 042 | Providing a web site that gives computer users the ability to upload and share user-generated videos, on a wide variety of topics and subjects | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2025 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 28, 2019 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | AAUW | ALLEGED AMENDMENT TO USE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2019 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2019 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 4, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |