USPTO serial 87205851
SPLIFF NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPLIFF NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason Zedeck
JASON ZEDECK CYPRESS LLP11111 SANTA MONICA BLVD, SUITE 500LOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational and entertainment services, namely, a continuing program about marijuana use, culture, lifestyle, activities, businesses, education, news, cultivation and products accessible by radio, television, satellite, audio, video and computer networks accessible by radio, television, satellite, audio, video and computer networks; Entertainment services in the nature of a television series, video podcasts and webcasts about marijuana use, culture, lifestyle, activities and products; Entertainment services, namely, providing video podcasts in the field of marijuana use, culture, lifestyle, activities and products; Entertainment services, namely, providing webcasts in the field of marijuana use, culture, lifestyle, activities and products; Entertainment services, namely, an ongoing series featuring news and information about marijuana use, culture, lifestyle, activities, businesses, education, news, cultivation and products provided through broadcast, satellite, cable and Internet transmission; Entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts in the field of marijuana use, culture, lifestyle, activities and products; Providing an Internet website portal featuring entertainment news and information specifically in the field of of marijuana use, culture, lifestyle, activities, businesses, education, news, cultivation and products; Providing information, news and commentary in the field of current events relating to marijuana use, culture, lifestyle, activities, businesses, education, news, cultivation and products; Providing on-line magazines in the field of marijuana use, culture, lifestyle, activities, businesses, education, news, cultivation and products; Providing on-line newsletters in the field of marijuana use, culture, lifestyle, activities, businesses, education, news, cultivation and products; Providing online interviews featuring celebrities and athletes in the field of marijuana use, culture, lifestyle, activities, businesses, education, news, cultivation and products for entertainment purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |