USPTO serial 87206043
CONNOLLY'S TOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIRANDA, JOHN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONNOLLY'S TOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nathan M. Cockerham
NATHAN M. COCKERHAM MAKI, LEDIN, BICK & OLSON1109 TOWER AVENUESUPERIOR, WI 54880UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Non-alcoholic syrup mixture of sugar, eggs, salt and flavorings to be mixed with rum and brandy to form a Tom and Jerry drink | ACTIVE | Nov 13, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | RSHG | REQUEST FOR SPECIAL HANDLING - GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | TRMS | TEAS REQUEST TO MAKE SPECIAL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | RSHD | REQUEST FOR SPECIAL HANDLING DENIED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | TRMS | TEAS REQUEST TO MAKE SPECIAL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |