USPTO serial 87206591
SMARTVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah Otte Graber
SARAH OTTE GRABER WOOD HERRON & EVANS LLP441 VINE STREET2700 CAREW TOWERCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Beacon machines and apparatus transmitting radio signals; blank near field communication (NFC) tags and non-blank near field communication (NFC) tags for making mobile payments, providing advertising information; and near field communication (NFC) technology- enabled readers; cameras; camera hardware systems for IP (Internet protocol) video surveillance; wireless communication devices for transmitting images taken by a camera; remote video monitoring system consisting primarily of a camera and video monitor for recording and transmitting images to a remote location; computer software for use in managing consumer information; computer software and electronic devices in the nature of RFID readers and tags, tablet computers, personal computers, mobile computers, mobile phones, cameras, infrared sensors, wireless routers, wireless access point (WAP) devices, lasers not for medical use, and beacons for analyzing and compiling consumer data for advertising purposes and market research purposes; electronic and digital shelf signage with wireless capability; digital signage; digital signage monitors; computer hardware and software system featuring electronic and mobile devices in the nature of RFID readers and tags, tablet computers, personal computers, mobile computers, mobile phones, cameras, infrared sensors, wireless routers, wireless access point (WAP) devices, lasers not for medical use, and beacons and computer software for use in interacting with consumers, adapting retail environments and data, data compilation and storage, database management, and digital signage and digital advertising systems management | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business data analysis services; data processing services; development, operation and administration of digital signage systems and digital advertising systems for others, in the nature of providing and managing advertising space by electronic means and global computer information networks and providing and managing advertising signage | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Text messaging services for transmission of advertising content and personal data via SMS for the marketing purposes of others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LSI Industries Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by LSI Industries Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named SMARTVISION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 24, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 22, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |