Drawing for DERIVE TUNECLOUD

USPTO serial 87207351

DERIVE TUNECLOUD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DERIVE TUNECLOUD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert S. Beiser

ROBERT S. BEISER VEDDER PRICE P.C.222 N LASALLE ST 25TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable cloud-computing software for providing a platform for dealers and end-users to exchange and store custom tuning programs for vehicles as well as a social media platform for enthusiasts and customers to share stories and ideasACTIVE
042Providing a web hosting platform for providing a platform for dealers and end-users to exchange and store custom tuning programs for vehicles as well as a social media platform for enthusiasts and customers to share stories and ideas; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for tuning of vehicles and providing data concerning improved vehicle performance, and for electronic storage of such data; providing an on-line network environment that features technology that enables users to share data; providing a web site featuring technology that enables internet users to share documents, images and videos; providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to upload, download, share and sell custom and branded digital publicationsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 17, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 17, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 17, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 17, 2018EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Dec 23, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 21, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 21, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 21, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 27, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 2, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 2, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 24, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 9, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 9, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 9, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 9, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 9, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 2, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 2, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 22, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2017CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED
Jan 30, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 30, 2017GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jan 30, 2017GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jan 30, 2017CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Jan 26, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 25, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Oct 24, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 21, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance