USPTO serial 87207790
37.8°C
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 37.8°C?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin K. Tung
KEVIN K TUNG KEVIN KERVENG TUNG PCQUEENS CROSSING BUSINESS CENTER136-20 38TH AVE STE 3DFLUSHING, NY 11354Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Women's apparel, namely, blouse, tee shirt, sweatshirt, dress shirt, dress, cardigan, jacket, skirt, shorts, pants, underwear, active wear, sleepwear, bra, active bra, tank tops, suits, casual wear, outerwear, and coats; Men's apparel, namely, jacket, dress shirt, tee shirt, sweatshirt, cardigan, suits, underwear, active wear, sleep wear, shorts, pants, tank tops and all types of pull overs | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |