USPTO serial 87208885
WELDING ENGINEERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WELDING ENGINEERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURA L BEOGLOS
LAURA L BEOGLOS SAND SEBOLT & WERNOW LPA4940 MUNSON ST NW AEGIS TOWER SUITE 1100CANTON, OH 44718-3615UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINE PARTS, NAMELY, FEEDSCREWS, SINGLE, TWIN AND TRIPLE FEEDSCREWS, EXTRUDERS, CALENDERS, ROLL MILLES, AND MATERIAL FEEDERS, ALL FOR PROCESSING PLASTIC AND RUBBER; MACHINE PARTS, NAMELY, PLASTIC AND RUBBER PROCESSING LINES AND EXTRUDER LINES | ABANDONED | Apr 16, 1998 |
| 009 | CONTROL SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLER (PLC) TOUCH SCREENS, GEARBOXES, TEMPERATURE CONTROL PANELS, AND WATER-COOLED FEED PORTS FOR USE WITH FEEDSCREWS, SINGLE, TWIN AND TRIPLE FEEDSCREWS, EXTRUDERS, CALENDERS, ROLL MILLES, AND MATERIAL FEEDERS | ABANDONED | Apr 16, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2024 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 10, 2024 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 10, 2024 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2024 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2017 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |