USPTO serial 87209388
ELEVATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELEVATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Sip
3660 TARAVAL ST. APT. 2SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94116UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Personalized financial planning, namely, personalized financial planning services, personalized financial planning, personalized financial portfolio management, personalized investment management programs, personalized online financial planning services, comprehensive personalized financial planning for individuals or businesses, and providing a secure web site featuring personal personalized financial information and financial advice; personalized financial budgeting planning services, namely, personal personalized spending, saving, and investment plans and services, and personalized financial advisory and consulting services; personalized higher education expense planning services, namely, personalized education savings plans, personalized education expense planning, and personalized higher education expense plans; personalized retirement planning services, namely, personalized retirement savings planning, personalized asset allocation plans, and personalized retirement savings options; personalized insurance and risk management services, namely, personalized insurance planning, personalized asset protection, personalized asset allocation programs, and personalized insurance coverage planning | ACTIVE | Aug 4, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 23, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |