Drawing for FINCH

USPTO serial 87226332

FINCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FINCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul A. McLean,

PAUL A. MCLEAN, GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP1900 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, FIFTH FLOOREAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software system in the nature of a hand-mounted electronic controller with intuitive input and gesture interface control functionality using natural gestures and touchpad sensors, and downloadable mobile operating software for use therewith, all for use in controlling non-game related virtual reality environments appearing via mobile virtual reality glasses, headsets, and computer hardware, and for use in controlling aerial drones, robots, network connected electronic devices in the nature of smart-TVs, stereo systems, automobiles, vehicles, devices for use in smart home systems, namely, home and kitchen appliances, lighting, ovens, alarms, security cameras, video and audio devices, namely, cameras and speakers, access systems, namely, electric and electronic locks, gates and barriers, air conditioners, ventilation systems, HVAC systems, and IP Internet and cell alarm communicators, being in the internet of things (IoT) and computers, and also for use in controlling sign language communications and translations software and computer hardware; computer games and virtual reality computer gamesACTIVE—
028Game controllers for computer games with intuitive input and gesture interface control functionality using natural gestures and touchpad sensors for use in virtual reality game environments with mobile virtual reality glasses, headsets, and devices, and for use with playing computer games on network connected electronic devices and computersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 11, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 16, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 16, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 14, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 14, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 14, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 27, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 14, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 12, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance