USPTO serial 87232082
VRTREK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VRTREK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Helsinki, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean F. Mellino
SEAN F. MELLINO WALTER | HAVERFIELD LLPTHE TOWER AT ERIEVIEW1301 EAST 9TH STREET, SUITE 3500CLEVELAND, OH 44114-1821Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Measuring apparatus and instruments; Augmented reality software; Computer graphics software; Computer software; Computer software designed to estimate resource requirements; Computer software for measurement of performance of software; Computer software for measurement of performance of hardware; Apparatus for monitoring and recording the performance of machinery; Computer software adapted for use in the operation of computers; Computer software for computer system and application development, deployment and management; Data processing equipment; Computers; Data processing software for graphic representations; Software; Virtual reality software; Virtual reality headsets; Computer hardware; Virtual reality hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation of computer hardware; Repair of computer hardware; Maintenance of computer hardware; Upgrading of computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer hardware and software consultancy; Design and development of computer software; Design and development of computer hardware; Design and development of virtual reality software; Hosting services and software as a service and rental of software; Installation, maintenance, repair and servicing of computer software; Installation of computer software; IT consultancy, advisory and information services; IT services; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software; Software as a service (SaaS); Software design; Software development, programming and implementation; Testing of computer software; Testing of computer hardware; Computer hardware leasing; Diagnosing computer hardware problems using software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |