USPTO serial 87241635
RYGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RYGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Greger
JEFFREY H. GREGER HAUPTMAN HAM, LLP2318 MILL ROADSUITE 1400ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; blank magnetic data carriers, recording discs, and optical discs, namely, blank record disks, blank recordable optical disc magnetic data carriers, recording discs; data processing equipment and computers; audio amplifiers; audio electronic components, namely, surround sound systems; audio headphones; audio frequency transformers; audio transmitter unit; computer games software; audio speakers; audio speaker enclosures; Consumer electronic products, namely, audio amplifiers, audio speakers, audio receivers, electrical audio and speaker cables and connectors, audio decoders, video decoders, speakers, power conversion devices, power converters, and power inverters; loudspeakers, headphones, microphones and CD players; headphones; personal headphones for use with sound transmitting systems; protective cases for audio equipment in the nature of audio mixers; stereo headphones; musical juke boxes; computer software for controlling the operation of audio and video devices ; peripheral devices for computers; downloadable computer software for controlling the operation of audio and video devices; portable mini speakers; wireless speakers; wireless headphones; computer operating programs, recorded; scanners; juke boxes for computers; intercommunication apparatus, namely, telephones; interfaces for computers; readers, namely, optical disk readers, RFID readers, smart card readers; disk drives, namely, computer disc drives, digital disc drives; computer monitors; printers for use with computer; computer memories; computer operating programs, recorded; integrated circuit chips; magnetic data media, namely, typeface fonts recorded on magnetic media; transmitters, namely, telephone transmitters, transmitters of electronic signals, radio transmitters; magnetic tape units, namely, magnetic-tape recorders, magnetic-tape drives; batteries, electric; detectors, namely, radar detectors, laser speed detectors; electric wires; electric relays; blank smart cards, cards and microprocessors for computers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |